I spent a lot of my time off last week watching movies. Since movies have been a passion of mine for far longer than anything else, it was a much loved way to spend my evenings. I continued my evening movie trend last night with The Woman In Black. This is the first post-potter film I’ve seen from Radcliffe and I’m fairy certain it is his first post-potter release. Either way I was left impressed and disappointed all at once.
I thought it would be strange to see Radcliffe in another role, but it actually wasn’t. Perhaps this is because he is a talented young actor with a bright future. However, I was disappointed that of all the roles he decided to take on, this was his first post-potter choice. Don’t get me wrong, I think after spending a decade filming the largest book to movie franchise he was due for something new. I actually expected it to be something unnaturally extreme. I thought he’d take a role playing a badass of sorts. A drug addict perhaps? In other words; I thought he’d take on the polar opposite of Harry Potter in order to show he has range and sustainability. Although Radcliffe did a good job in The Woman In Black, there wasn’t much to it.
With TWIB, they’ve managed to create a foundation of mystique around the hidden secrets of this small town, and the creep factor was high. My wife spent the entire movie clinging to my arm. For me – someone who rarely jumps from something popping out of the shadows – there were a few moments that even I received a chill. A shudder of terror that made me wonder just what I was looking at. Shadows, or something more?
This film was very well done. They instilled fear in me without gore or massive special effects. Instead, they opted for a classic approach; creaks in the floor, chairs that rocks on their own, the shadows that move (or do they?), creepy children’s toys, and the foggy hand print in the window. There were more than a few moments of the spine tingling variety. In this sense, they did a very good job.
Now I’m not one to criticize films or talk about the director’s approach to a scene of light versus dark, etc. I’m not educated in things and as such, I don’t talk about them. However, I watch a lot of movies and I can talk about what disappointed me as strictly a viewer.
My issue with this film came in a few different streams. There is virtually no dialogue in this film. Now granted, I really enjoyed the movie and I didn’t realize this until the end, but once the movie was over I realized Radcliffe hardly talks at all. His post-potter role consists of him lurking around a house and spending more time fiddling with things than actually looking at paperwork (the reason he is there in the first place). I guess after seeing the movie and having reflected on it for a short time, I expected something more in your face. This is a very passive role and I think for the talent that Radcliffe has, he could’ve selected something more powerful. Then again, perhaps he was going for subtlety, in which case, he succeeded. The core of this film was very well done but my major disappointment comes with the end. I know I’m not the only one who feels this way since I had been somewhat warned about it by multiple people, but when it came, I was still surprised.